The company, headed by way of British inventor Sir James Dyson, stated it had spoke back to the government's request for help.
Meanwhile, a consortium of more than a dozen organizations pursuits to build ventilators based on two current designs.
Some enterprise insiders have advised that Dyson's approach to create a new version will take too long.
In a statement, Dyson stated it were operating with The Technology Partnership, a medical agency based in Cambridge, to increase a "significant and timely response".
"This is a fairly complex undertaking being undertaken in an exceptionally challenging time frame," it added.
"We are undertaking a completely regulated clinical tool improvement, which includes trying out within the laboratory and in people, and we're scaling up for volume."
Engineers, anaesthetists and surgeons from the University of Oxford and King's College London are working on another new type of ventilator. It is less advanced than existing commercial models, but benefits from being relatively quick to construct.
End of Twitter post by @OxVent
"Creating new designs which can complement existing models might help meet demand," commented Dr Federico Formenti, who is part of the OxVent team.
"Companies can't switch overnight - you can't put a Formula One component into a ventilator, it will take time."
The project is still waiting to hear back from the government.
It normally takes two to three years to design and bring a new ventilator to market, and there is concern that the NHS could run short of equipment in a matter of weeks.
"Recreating established prototypes is likely to be a faster way to deal with the immediate demand," Dr Marion Hersh, senior lecturer in biomedical engineering at the University of Glasgow.
"They may not have to go through all the regulatory hoops, but regulation will still need to be done properly. However, there could be value in more than one option in the slightly longer term.
The production change frame Make UK had initially counseled that Dyson may alternatively play a position by way of assisting source hard-to-get components that others should use.
Prof Nick Oliver, from the University of Edinburgh's Business School, commented that time might be wasted if green businesses tried to design and bring their personal ventilators.
"Great products come from painstaking checking out, refinement and a deep know-how of the context of use," he delivered.
"Rather than tasking non-scientific agencies to expand and convey ventilators from scratch, policymakers would do higher to cognizance on the way to expand the potential of present tool manufacturers, who already have this particular expertise.
"Celebrating inventiveness and resourcefulness is all nicely and appropriate, however this isn't the pinnacle priority for the time being."
A consortium called The Ventilator Challenge UK targets alternatively to fabricate scientific ventilators using current designs.
Its members include:
clinical ventilator experts Penlon and Smiths
Airbus
Ford
McLaren
Rolls-Royce
One of the fashions is based totally on an anaesthetic ventilator made by way of Penlon, that is bulkier than the ones generally used in intensive care wards.
The business enterprise's product chief previously warned that asking non-professionals to make ventilators might be "unrealistic".
Smiths' transportable ParaPac ventilator is the alternative system the organization aims to manufacture, in keeping with a file through the Guardian newspaper.
The company has already introduced plans to deliver 5,000 greater ventilators within two weeks, and has stated it intends to deliver tens of lots greater over the approaching months.
"We are doing the whole thing feasible to appreciably boom manufacturing of our ventilators at our Luton site and worldwide," said Andrew Reynolds Smith, leader government of Smiths.
